2016-02-29 23:19 GMT-08:00 David Emrany <david.emrany(a)gmail.com>om>:
so reading your email, we also recall these quotes
from the time of the
Stanton Foundation fiasco ? [1]
"The Executive Director and Chief Revenue Officer agree that in the
future, any grants that are not unrestricted will receive a special
high level of scrutiny before being accepted."
..
"The ED plans, with the C-level team, to develop a better process for
staff to escalate and express concerns about any WMF activities that
staff think may in tension with, or in violation of, community
policies or best practices. It will take some time to develop a
simple, robust process: we aim to have it done by 1 May 2014."
I'm not sure if there's a question for me here? I wasn't involved in
the Belfer project until the postmortem. The ED transition happened
shortly thereafter. Regardless of whether it came up in that context
(I don't know for sure, but I doubt it), the follow-up was lost in the
shuffle. Nemo pointed that out a few months later, and Lila's final
response on the issue is here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2015-March/077339.html
Erik