Milos, I read the points you are making in your initial post, and I cannot
tell what actions you are seeking. I am not even really clear on what the
problem is that you are "reporting". The best I can make of it is that you
don't think there are enough articles in the Wikipedias of the languages of
the Indian subcontinent, and that somehow it is the WMF's fault.
Risker/Anne
On 28 June 2016 at 11:51, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Anders Wennersten
<mail(a)anderswennersten.se> wrote:
I have been active in FDC and followed closely
all applicants. It works
very
well when it comes to promote small affiliates to
grow in a controlled
way
and ensuring that money is spent wisely. The FDC,
though, demand an
elaborate plan, and application, which can be (too) hard as a first step
if
you still is an volunteer driven organisation.
So since a year the
Simple
annual plan grant now exist, and I have been part
in this and its seven
applicants that has been through that process. And it works wonderfully
even
if there has been quite complicated issues in the
application. The
application formality is much easier and the applicant gets hands-on
help by
both WMF staff and also by a peer from an
existing affiliate. And the
feedback we have received has been very very positive, specially the
support
from peers. And for you Milos who was in ChapCom
at the same time as me
in
2008, you should rejoice as much as me that now
also Brazil is on track,
so
the "complicated" affiliates in 2008,
Catala, Brazil an US, are now all
on
track.
So we now have process in place that really help and support small
groups of
enthusiastic Wikimedians to grow in a controlled
way becoming well
functioning chapters. We have also since 2008 learnt, from experiences
from
Brazil and India, that to try by
"outsiders" to get a local
organisation in
place that will grow in a good way, just has not
worked. These
experiments
just hindered (and delayed) natural good
establishment.
So my learning is that it is counter productive to try as an outsider to
get
something happen. We have to await until groups
of clever Wikimedians in
India with the right ambition etc are ready to enter applications to
either
of the grant programs, and then there are
mechanisms in place to help
them
evolve
Anders, we've been asked for help at least twice that I know, as I can
witness for those two times. The first time I thought it will be
solved, but it hasn't been solved after two years. Plus, a couple of
previous years of getting informal complaints in relation to the WMF's
behavior in India.
The *problem* is that WMF is actually participating in keeping the
mess in perpetual state. And it's not about bad intentions, but about
incompetence. So, let's start solving *our* problem with India, not
*Indian* problem with us.
--
Milos
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>