(anonymous) wrote:
[…]
This remains contradictory, and that is why I'm
trying to get some clarity
on the role Sue played in the past two years. The tasks described by
Patricio in his response to the Signpost sound to me (but I might be naive
in this) to be mostly relevant to the initial transition period, and not to
span 2 years. Is Patricio underselling Sue's involvement and was there a
reason not to mention her as contractor? Am I somehow misunderstanding the
compensation issue (i.e. was there a compensation for earlier years, or was
it lowered)?
[…]
Is compensation for earlier years legal in the US? In Ger-
many, since the clarification in the Mannesmann trial
(cf.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mannesmann-Prozess), this
would not be possible.
Tim