Marc - just wanted to thank you for using "begging the question" properly!
Chris - thanks for your insight. To Anders' point, perhaps not all insights
offered will be new to everyone. But where some problems or potential
solutions have been identified by some, it will be nice for them to have
reinforcement in a formal expert report. And to the rest of us for whom
board decision-making is opaque, a governance review with a published
report will be highly enlightening.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:44 AM, marc <marc(a)uberbox.org> wrote:
governance consultants are very unlikely to recommend
or support (say) live-streaming board meetings to
increase transparency,
or
making community-elected trustees unsackable without a referendum of some
kind
Most of what you said is valuable, but I have to point out that you are
begging the question that those things are a good idea. They may well be
-- but if you reach out for expertise with a prejudice on what the
"correct" advice is, you are wasting everyone's time.
-- Coren / Marc
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>