Marc - just wanted to thank you for using "begging the question" properly!
Chris - thanks for your insight. To Anders' point, perhaps not all insights offered will be new to everyone. But where some problems or potential solutions have been identified by some, it will be nice for them to have reinforcement in a formal expert report. And to the rest of us for whom board decision-making is opaque, a governance review with a published report will be highly enlightening.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:44 AM, marc marc@uberbox.org wrote:
governance consultants are very unlikely to recommend
or support (say) live-streaming board meetings to increase transparency, or making community-elected trustees unsackable without a referendum of some kind
Most of what you said is valuable, but I have to point out that you are begging the question that those things are a good idea. They may well be -- but if you reach out for expertise with a prejudice on what the "correct" advice is, you are wasting everyone's time.
-- Coren / Marc
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe