I'm sure there are plenty of people who would feel uncomfortable with that.
So if something like that were to be done, people should certainly be asked
first, and that only be done if they explicitly agree.
Still, I think a lot of others would feel like their efforts are being
noticed and appreciated. So long as it's opt-in only, I think it's a great
idea.
Several people have, from time to time, done "editor of the day" type
things, but those usually only recognized people who'd already been around
a while. One that specifically focuses on promising newer editors might
work quite well and make people feel more welcome.
On Jan 20, 2016 4:12 PM, "Risker" <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 January 2016 at 17:51, Andy Mabbett
<andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>
wrote:
On 20 January 2016 at 20:56, Asaf Bartov
<abartov(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> It is an excellent and popular way to *celebrate* (not just describe)
> good-faith new contributors. The way it works is a couple of
volunteers
> who run the page look for a relatively new
contributor who seems to
have
> successfully integrated on-wiki, and has
made more than a handful of
good
contributions, and they approach the new contributor with a request for
an
interview and a description of this page.
Sounds great. If en.WP do this as part of The Signpost, it would have
a high level of reach, immediately. Same with Wikidata's weekly
update.
Heh. I think back to when I first started editing. I would have been
completely freaked out at that level of "notice" and would never have
edited again.
Risker/Anne
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>