Should only the staff have a say in this vision? Almost all, if not all, of this talk is
about what the staff wants.
From: yastrakhan(a)wikimedia.org
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:45:28 +0300
To: wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED would you like to see?
Greg, agree 100%, but that's not how I understood the question and the
results of the staff survey. It seemed the staff expected the vision from
the ED/Management.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Grossmeier <greg(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
<quote name="Yuri Astrakhan"
date="2016-02-27" time="03:17:36 +0300">
Subbu, one of the chief complains I heard about
Lila was that she did not
provide a clear vision. Yet, if we choose stewardship over leadership,
that, at least in my mind, implies more of a mediator than a leader,
without providing any clear vision themselves. So is vision no longer a
requirement from the ED?
Vision shouldn't be a one-person created thing.
Greg
--
| Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E |
| identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D |
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>