Should only the staff have a say in this vision? Almost all, if not all, of this talk is about what the staff wants.
From: yastrakhan@wikimedia.org Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:45:28 +0300 To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] What kind of ED would you like to see?
Greg, agree 100%, but that's not how I understood the question and the results of the staff survey. It seemed the staff expected the vision from the ED/Management.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Grossmeier greg@wikimedia.org wrote:
<quote name="Yuri Astrakhan" date="2016-02-27" time="03:17:36 +0300"> > Subbu, one of the chief complains I heard about Lila was that she did not > provide a clear vision. Yet, if we choose stewardship over leadership, > that, at least in my mind, implies more of a mediator than a leader, > without providing any clear vision themselves. So is vision no longer a > requirement from the ED?
Vision shouldn't be a one-person created thing.
Greg
-- | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D |
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe