On 22 February 2016 at 01:06, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The discussion about post-mortems arose rather
organically, not as a result
of a decision to use a certain medium. The participants were: Jonathan
Cardy, Erik Möller, Dariusz Jemielniak, myself, Ben Creasy, Asaf Bartov,
Jon Beasley-Murray, Bence Damakos, Luis Villa, Eddie Erhart, Liam Wyatt,
and Tisza Gergő. I think it is fair to say that we had a general consensus
that:
When something does not go well (for instance, various software releases),
it would be highly valuable for the Wikimedia Foundation's senior
leadership to prioritize creating a thoughtful and official post-mortem
document and discussion.
So they want there to be even more incentives for the foundation never to
admit failure?
--
geni