On 22 February 2016 at 01:06, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.com wrote:
The discussion about post-mortems arose rather organically, not as a result of a decision to use a certain medium. The participants were: Jonathan Cardy, Erik Möller, Dariusz Jemielniak, myself, Ben Creasy, Asaf Bartov, Jon Beasley-Murray, Bence Damakos, Luis Villa, Eddie Erhart, Liam Wyatt, and Tisza Gergő. I think it is fair to say that we had a general consensus that:
When something does not go well (for instance, various software releases), it would be highly valuable for the Wikimedia Foundation's senior leadership to prioritize creating a thoughtful and official post-mortem document and discussion.
So they want there to be even more incentives for the foundation never to admit failure?