On 20 Aug 2016, at 13:00,
wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikimedia-l mailing list submissions to
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
wikimedia-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wikimedia-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic
organisation criteria (Pine W)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:05:37 -0700
From: Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>,
Wikimedia Movement Affiliates discussion list
<affiliates(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: Wikimedia Chapters general discussions <chapters(a)wikimedia.ch>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and
thematic organisation criteria
Message-ID:
<CAF=dyJhKg3PpVwXLM1s=NEQxacx6++Pgao+KnsSWYCKoVLN37g(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I might suggest distinguishing the resourcing issue from the chapter status
criteria.
I am of the view that expecting volunteers to be available for the same
kind and quantity of work as paid part-time or full-time staff is
unrealistic, that WMF should provide a smoother glide slope from
all-volunteer affiliate to affiliate with first time paid staff, and that
WMF should rethink their one-size-fits-all approach of requiring
substantial programmatic activity before agreeing to fund any part-time
paid staff even for as little as ten hours per month. It seems to me that
WMF is limiting its own effectiveness with its current approach of setting
such a high bar before agreeing to fund part-time paid staff. But those are
issues for WMF staff, not for the Affiliations Committee.
On a slightly different subject, I think that your email helps to
illustrate how quantitative rather than qualitative criteria would be
helpful in understanding where the thresholds are. To illustrate further:
"Diversity of Activities: Chapters and thematic organisations are expected
to plan and conduct a variety of different programs and events." Does "a
variety" mean three, five, or ten?
"to balance online and offline projects": are chapters now required to have
at least one online and one offline project? Are online and offline
projects supposed to be even in number, meaning that if there are three
online projects then there must be three offline projects?
"to strive for continuous activity": what is "continuous activity",
and is
it a goal or a requirement?
"and to conduct programs and events at least once every two months.": this
seems straightforward.
"Planning and Evaluation: Chapters and thematic organisations are expected
to set specific goals and targets for programs, projects, and events before
executing them; to measure the results of programs, projects, and events
against those targets; and to report on those results to the Wikimedia
Foundation and the wider Wikimedia movement.": I like this requirement,
keeping in mind that goals and targets may be difficult to set,
particularly where a program, project, or event is new to an affiliate or a
particular audience.
"External Partnerships: Chapters and thematic organisations are expected to
engage in programmatic partnerships with external groups and organizations
(for example, cultural, academic, or government institutions, and so on) to
promote the Wikimedia movement and to add and improve content on Wikimedia
projects.": how many partnerships are required? How often must partners be
engaged in programs?
I like the general approach of the criteria, but quantitative specificity
would be helpful.
Pine
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Brill Lyle
<wp.brilllyle(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Lane.
Setting higher criteria is all well and good -- as is expecting boards to
be cognizant of these expectations.
But we are dealing with volunteers doing a significant amount of free
digital labor and organizing. To set a bar super high in that structure is
a lot to expect of people contributing their T&E.
Both Lane and I are part of Wikimedia NYC, a very active chapter that
somehow (I believe) manages to meet these criteria amidst almost
exponential growth of activities. The administrative burden on both our
leadership and membership is heavy, and I am grateful for everyone's pitch
in / can do approach and willingness to contribute.
And no, the answer is not to do less events and have less support to
institutional partners and various initiatives. That's not practical or
good for anyone.
But it brings to mind a recent trip I made where I visited the Wikimedia
Deutschland offices. Where there was a whole room (!) of 6 fully set up
computers with I am assuming the same number of staff for Event planning
alone -- all which I assume are paid positions. That really made me pause
in shock. And feel like a bit of an idiot that our chapter does so much
without that type of structural support.
So while I understand the idea of these criteria, to have the balance beam
heavily weighted on requirements without attendant support is not a
workable model.
- Erika
Secretary, Wikimedia NYC -- but not speaking on behalf of anyone but myself
*Erika Herzog*
Wikipedia *User:BrillLyle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrillLyle>*
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Romaine Wiki <romaine.wiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The criteria are for those groups who want to
apply for an official
status
at WMF. In general I think all chapters should
try to meet with these
criteria. If a chapter is not able to structurally full-fill these
criteria, a different board is the solution to revive the chapter.
I personally think the criteria are a balanced set of guidelines to be
followed.
It is important for the movement to share the experiences and the
results.
Much more should be shared through best
practices, how to's, reports and
newsletters, like
https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter for
collaborations with various partner
organisations.
Romaine
2016-08-19 16:51 GMT+02:00 Lane Rasberry <lane(a)bluerasberry.com>om>:
Hello,
Do these criteria apply to existing groups? Maybe I misunderstand, but
from this proposal it sounds like new groups will be held to
significantly
> higher standards than any currently recognized organizations. Is that
the
case?
yours,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Carlos M. Colina <
maorx(a)wikimedia.org.ve>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> On behalf of the Affiliations Committee, I would like to present some
> changes to the current chapter and thematic organisation criteria,
which we
>> will begin piloting as we officially reopen applications for chapter
and
>> thematic organization status. Until now,
the criteria had not clearly
>> defined what constitutes sufficient programmatic activity to justify
>> chapter or thematic organisation status. To address this issue, we
have
set
> out three new criteria:
>
> 1. Diversity of Activities: Chapters and thematic organisations are
> expected to plan and conduct a variety of different programs and
events; to
> balance online and offline projects; to
strive for continuous
activity; and
> to conduct programs and events at least
once every two months.
> 2. Planning and Evaluation: Chapters and thematic organisations are
> expected to set specific goals and targets for programs, projects,
and
> events before executing them; to measure
the results of programs,
projects,
> and events against those targets; and to
report on those results to
the
>> Wikimedia Foundation and the wider Wikimedia movement.
>> 3. External Partnerships: Chapters and thematic organisations are
>> expected to engage in programmatic partnerships with external
groups
and
> organizations (for example, cultural,
academic, or government
institutions,
> and so on) to promote the Wikimedia
movement and to add and improve
content
> on Wikimedia projects.
>
> In order to officially reopen the chapter and thematic organization
> recognition process, the Board of Trustees has instructed the
Affiliations
> Committee to provisionally use these three
new criteria for all new
> applicants. In addition, potential chapters and thematic organisations
will
> continue to be assessed against the existing
legal, governance, and
> viability criteria; more details, including the benefits and
limitations of
> these affiliation models, are available on
Meta.[1] [2]
>
> Please note that the use of these three new criteria is a pilot; there
> will be opportunities to share feedback about the criteria, as well as
> other ways to help define the chapter and thematic organisation
affiliate
> models, during the upcoming strategy
consultation. The Affiliations
> Committee and the Board of Trustees will continue to evaluate results
and
> feedback during the initial pilot period and
consider potential
revisions
>> to the criteria before they are finalized.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> M.
>>
>> 1:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/Chapt
>> er_Summary_Matrix
>> 2:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/Thema
>> tic_Organisation_Summary_Matrix
>> --
>> "*Jülüjain wane mmakat* ein kapülain tü alijunakalirua jee
wayuukanairua
>> junain ekerolaa alümüin supüshuwayale
etijaanaka. Ayatashi waya
junain."
>
Carlos M. Colina
> Socio, A.C. Wikimedia Venezuela | RIF J-40129321-2 |
www.wikimedia.org.ve
> <http://wikimedia.org.ve>
> Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Affiliations Committee
> Phone: +972-52-4869915
> Twitter: @maor_x
>
> El logotipo y el nombre de Wikimedia, Wikimedia Venezuela
> <http://wikimedia.org.ve/wiki/P%C3%A1gina_principal>, Wikipedia,
> Wikimedia Commons, Wikimedia Incubator, Wiktionary y otros proyectos
> relacionados <https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Our_Projects> son
> marcas registradas usadas bajo permiso expreso de su titular, la
Fundación
>> Wikimedia, Inc. <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>, una
organización
>> sin fines de lucro. Otros nombres y
marcas pertenecen a sus
respectivos
>
propietarios.
>
> Asociación Civil Wikimedia Venezuela (Wikimedia Venezuela) | RIF.:
> J-40129321-2 | Los Teques, Estado Miranda. Venezuela
> _______________________________________________
> Affiliates mailing list
> Affiliates(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/affiliates
--
Lane Rasberry
user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia
206.801.0814
lane(a)bluerasberry.com
_______________________________________________
Affiliates mailing list
Affiliates(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/affiliates
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
------------------------------
End of Wikimedia-l Digest, Vol 149, Issue 29
********************************************