Hoi, When you do that all your data is removed and you are banned from Wikidata. Thanks, GerardM
On 29 November 2015 at 11:40, Lilburne lilburne@tygers-of-wrath.net wrote:
On 29/11/2015 00:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, It was from the Myanmar WIkipedia that a lot of data was imported to Wikidata. Data that did not exist elsewhere. I do not care really what "Freedom House" says. I do not know them, I do know that the data is relevant and useful It was even the subject on a blogpost..
You may ignore data that is not from a source that you like. This indiscriminate POV is not a NPOV.
Isn't the point that the data was taken primarily because it was available, and that there was no attempt to verify its accuracy. If I give you 10,000 images of lichen but before hand randomly switch the names of 2000 of them and add misleading geodata randomly to another 2000 are the images useful as data? Would including them improve NPOV?
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe