No, this was a simple explanation of the facts of the limited authority of
the FDC, not an attempt to weasel.
Perhaps something was lost in translation?
Fae
On 26 Nov 2015 10:58, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hoi,
Sorry but "The FDC provides recommendations to the WMF Board, who then
decide on them. The FDC doesn't handle funds directly, so in no case does
it withhold, or spend, funds, instead it recommends doing so to the WMF
Board." qualify as weasel words. You make proposals and hope, expect that
they will be accepted. Not taking responsibility for your actions and
blaming them is the same as saying "we are only saying and they were not
thinking themselves."
Not good, not appreciated.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 25 November 2015 at 15:56, Michael Peel <email(a)mikepeel.net> wrote:
Hi MZMcBride,
> The Wikimedia Foundation has a section under "Organisation-specific
> remarks", but isn't included in the "Funding recommendations"
chart and
> there's no amount requested, amount allocated, or proposal listed for
the
Wikimedia
Foundation. Why is that?
They are organisation-specific remarks. :-) The WMF did not apply to the
FDC this round, hence why there are no amounts requested/allocated, or a
proposal to link to. The FDC felt it necessary to include recommendations
about the WMF anyway.
> If Wikimedia Deutschland is required to separate out costs for
Wikidata,
> does that mean that the Wikimedia Foundation
is required to split out
> costs for Wikipedia and its other projects? I'd be quite curious to
know
how much
money is being spent by the Wikimedia Foundation on Wiktionary
or
Wikinews or Wikiversity.
It's worth noting that there are two meanings to the word 'project' here
-
there are the Wikimedia projects, and then there
are projects run by the
Wikimedia organisations (think of, e.g., GLAM or education projects).
It's
particularly the latter case that is most
relevant to the FDC's work, and
in this case Wikidata falls under both meanings.
The report includes this note:
The FDC is appalled by the closed way that the
WMF has undertaken both
strategic and annual planning, and the WMF’s approach to budget
transparency (or lack thereof).
Sort of inline with the first question, but perhaps more direct: what
power does the Funds Dissemination Committee have over the amount of
donor
money allocated toward the Wikimedia Foundation?
Can the FDC only
admonish
the organization, but not actually withhold
funds?
The FDC provides recommendations to the WMF Board, who then decide on
them. The FDC doesn't handle funds directly, so in no case does it
withhold, or spend, funds, instead it recommends doing so to the WMF
Board.
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>