Yes this remark is only focused to give the feedback that our user experience is really different from that of the real users.
A question was done about the testing and in any country there are local associations that can give tests (in Italian language there is unitalsi).
An additional remark is that there is an additional reason to improve pages for blind persons and the reason is that the bots for SEO are "blind". They read the pages, don't see them.
Regards Il 28/Mag/2015 12:33, "Richard Symonds" richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.uk ha scritto:
This is a very enlightening discussion, but it's painfully apparent that there is no input in this discussion from someone who is sight-impaired, or input from an organisation like RNIB http://www.rnib.org.uk/about-rnib/web-accessibility-statement.
Getting a wide range of this input is really key before this can go much further.
Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 28 May 2015 at 10:58, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if I continue this discussion of January but it may be interesting
to
share my experience had yesterday because I attended to a presentation
of a
young programmer suffering from low vision and color-blind and usual participant in http://globalaccessibilityawarenessday.org/gaad.html.
It has been interesting because we experienced how is the life of a
person
studying and working in computer science but almost blind and we had the opportunity to be in his shoes.
The first lesson learned is that blind (or almost blind) people use
always
a software of speech synthesis with a speed that makes the audio almost unintelligible for not experienced people. The operating system provides several tools
for
that including mobile OS.
The second lesson is that this software of speech synthesis is crucial
for
them and they would set and control it. So forget the normal speed of
audio
that everyone of us is experienced to use.
The third lesson is that a lot of them in general hears music with
headset
and have the speech synthesis always on, if there is a third vocal synthesis for them is more a problem than an advantage.
The fourth lesson learned is that Wikipedia is for them a well done web site because the content is structured. It means that the Table of
Content
at the start (so neglected by some graphical reasons) is fundamental for them because they can easily jump in the section they need.
No one knew that I am from a Wikimedia chapter except the organizers and
I
did several questions about Wikipedia because (I did not know it) it was presented as "good" example of website for speech synthesis.
What can be improved, in my opinion it's only the "semantic" aspect of
the
Wikipedia, so pushing more the attention on the structure of the page,
and
the awareness that images are not useful for them. We must be aware that some tools used in Wikipedia, like Captcha, are a real obstacle for blind people, like stairs for people with wheelchairs.
Regards
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:55 AM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I see this as making it easier for people to generate files to
put
on their ipod or for those with a limited ability to read who might not have figured out more complicated solutions. Those who are blind have likely already figured out good solutions. It is those of us who are sighted that need the help.
I know that I personally would find such a button helpful. But through
a
great many steps I could likely figure out a work around. People prefer stuff that is simple.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Wikipedia: Ilario https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ilario Skype: valdelli Facebook: Ilario Valdelli https://www.facebook.com/ivaldelli Twitter: Ilario Valdelli https://twitter.com/ilariovaldelli Linkedin: Ilario Valdelli <
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=6724469
Tel: +41764821371 http://www.wikimedia.ch _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe