As Fae says, it's relatively easy to run low- or zero-cost editathons, and
we're not running out of volunteers who are happy to do it.
We might need to have a discussion, though, about how we're actually
gathering data from the editathons that happen independently of the WMF or
any thorgs. Do we gather that data? I assume it would be useful to gather!
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 19 March 2015 at 12:19, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This thread puzzles me. When I was the Chair of a
certain chapter, I
recall a strategy meeting where I was the only participant who did not
put "fund raising" as a 9/10 priority, I set it as merely 5/10. I
guess it is in this area of money and "branding" that world-views are
conflicting.
When we first coined the word "editathon" the working model was that
they were open events run at *zero cost* (we had no staff and
insignificant funds). Later we started providing a free buffet, paying
expenses for "trained helpers" and some others, and a couple years
after that it started to become impossible to organize an editathon
without first having an employee agreeing it, being required to use
official feedback forms and committing to making event reports to help
with future funding.
Basic facts:
* Unpaid volunteer editathon participants do not need travel costs,
they should be local people who can get on a local bus, and do not
need to travel hundreds of miles.
* Editathons work well when attendees can buy their own food from a
local cafe or expect a social event afterwards where they pay their
own costs. Frequently the hosting institution provides drinks and
sandwiches for free.
* Editathons work perfectly well without incurring employee costs
(this is why editathons work in countries where there are no Wikimedia
employees). Volunteers who know enough about Wikimedia projects to get
a geonotice approved and discuss the event in advance on relevant
wikiproject noticeboards or email lists do not need, nor even ask for,
funds.
* The world is stuffed with free venues and institutions looking to
support open knowledge. I had several organizations spontaneously
offer me top class venues in the UK, so long as I could get a handful
of keen editors to commit to coming. We are not even close to running
out of goodwill of this type.
Fae
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>