In the U.S., there is also a strong minority contingent of Libertarians, who tend to be on the right-wing/conservative part of the political spectrum. These are natural allies for both privacy & governmental non-intrunsion. I think that they would welcome WMF joining this legal action.
Yours, Peaceray
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:15 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
It's difficult to overstate how much people love us. We tell them everything about everything, and we're mostly right and try to stay neutral. But it's all written by just people! So it's cosy as well.
With SOPA, we discovered that: when Wikipedia says you suck, you *suck*.
So I'd expect that this will only look good for us. But I don't claim to have numbers to this effect.
On 10 March 2015 at 19:55, Johan Jönsson brevlistor@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-10 8:53 GMT+01:00 Michelle Paulson mpaulson@wikimedia.org:
Hi All,
I’m writing to let you know that today the Wikimedia Foundation[1] is filing suit against the National Security Agency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency, the
Department
of Justice <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice
,
and the U.S. Attorney General https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General[2] in
order
to challenge certain mass surveillance practices carried out by the U.S. government. We believe these practices are impinging the freedom to
learn,
inquire, and explore on Wikimedia sites.
Since the 2013 mass surveillance disclosures, we’ve heard concerns from
the
community about privacy on Wikipedia. This lawsuit is a step towards addressing the community's justified concerns. We believe that the surveillance methods being employed by the NSA under the authority of
the
FISA Amendments Act <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act_of_1978_...
negatively impact our users' ability and willingness to participate in
our
projects. Today, we fight back.
An op-ed <
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/opinion/stop-spying-on-wikipedia-users.htm...
by Lila and Jimmy about the lawsuit, and Wikimedia's stance on
government
surveillance, appeared in The New York Times this morning.
Additionally, we
just published a blog post https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/03/10/wikimedia-v-nsa/ with more information about the suit. (The post will also up on Meta for translation).
Curious question, by the way: how controversial would you expect this
move
to be domestically? From e.g. a Swedish perspective, the NSA is an intelligence agency of a foreign power and the other mentioned organizations are either largely uncontroversial and seen in a positive light (Amnesty, PEN, HRW) or unknown, but will it affect how the WMF is seen in the US?
//Johan Jönsson
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe