By cabalish I mean not closed lists with clear membership process as
cultural partners is but the like of the paris group where you've got to
be a part of a cabal in order to even know about it (or have cabal
member mention it somewhere in front of you).
--Base
On 10.06.2015 13:46, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 8 June 2015 at 23:35, Bohdan Melnychuk
<base-w(a)yandex.ru> wrote:
I'm sorry if some of the lists I listed were
intended as cabalish and not to
be disclosed to others. I don't think cabalish lists are a good way to
collaborate for wikimedians.
"Cabalish" is rather a pejorative term. We
have a closed GLAM list so
that we can have frank discussions without embarrassing our partner
organisations. if ether was no such list, then those discussions would
move to private emails, not become public.