My point is that reducing the number of anti WMF people in senior
positions on commons by one they might have converted some pro WMF people in senior positions on commons to anti WMF people, producing more damage for themselves than they hoped to create good.
I think if you're looking at this mainly as a way of getting rid of someone the WMF didn't like, then you have the wrong approach to the issue. _______________________________________________
This is the framework suggested by geni, not by me.
Ah - I see it was - thanks.
It is however a view that I've seen expressed in other discussions on this topic, so it's probably still a point worth making.
Personally I think this step will be quite good for the health of the community on Commons.
Chris