2015-12-29 10:15 GMT+01:00 Isarra Yos <zhorishna(a)gmail.com>om>:
It says a lot, but just what that is depends entirely
on the context. And
for community members who voted for him, that context could mean we should
also no longer have confidence in him elsewhere in the projects, or in the
board, or have no bearing on either thing whatsoever. Not knowing just
means there's no indication what to trust.
I'd rather lose the trust and confidence in those 8 Board members than in
him without knowing what was the cause for his disbarment. ;)
Maybe the Board by-laws have to be changed, too. Throwing out a
community-elected member like this, without providing a reason, is no way
to deal with the community who elected this member. It should be mandatory
that the Board provides reasons together with the announcement to avoid
exactly this kind of discussions and speculations, not a day (or more)
later.
And as for no-cause disbarments for community-elected members in a
community-driven environment - uhm... I don't need to delve into that,
everyone can see the problem. The Board should just not be allowed to
disbar community-elected members without a cause, as that undermines the
authority of the community over those seats on the Board.
Th.