Most of the time, admins behave as we would hope. Occasionally they don't, and on English Wikipedia when that happens often enough or seriously enough in the opinion of Arbcom, the offending admins are desysopped. I think that for legally sensitive pages, we'd be concerned about the possibility of having wheel-warring administrators or hijacked admin accounts. The latter can happen to anyone. Restricting certain pages to being edited only by Stewards via superprotect would help to protect against the former. Generally speaking I agree that standard "full protection" is sufficient, and superprotect should only be invoked in rare cases. I would trust Stewards to implement Superprotect at the request of the community, or upon hearing good cause for doing so from WMF.
Pine
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Ricordisamoa ricordisamoa@openmailbox.org wrote:
I trust administrators not to edit pages they shouldn't.
Il 11/08/2015 22:56, Risker ha scritto:
There are situations where not even the administrators of a particular community should be allowed to edit a page. A good example would be the pages that describe the copyright and licensing of Wikimedia products. Individual communities cannot change that (it applies globally), and individual administrators should not modify it. If there is a problem with translation, that needs to be brought to the attention of the WMF, because there may be a similar problem with translation elsewhere.
There are also some examples currently being discussed on the Wikitech-L list that may require significantly elevated levels of protection above 'all administrators on Project ABC', although they may call for another level of protection that can be customizable to allowing a much smaller group or specific individuals to be the only editors.
Risker/Anne
On 11 August 2015 at 16:43, Romaine Wiki romaine.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
So far I know it has only be used once after the occasion, see:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Superprotect
If anyone knows another occasion, I would like to ask to report this usage at this talk page to keep an overview in future.
Greetings, Romaine
2015-08-11 20:28 GMT+02:00 Magnus Manske magnusmanske@googlemail.com:
Out of curiosity, was it ever used again after that initial action?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:13 PM Laurentius laurentius.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 12/08/2015 alle 01.11 +0900, Hong, Yongmin ha scritto:
It has been a year (and a day) since the gerrit 153302 [1] has been merged and deployed to the dewiki.
And it's high time it got removed.
Laurentius
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wi...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wi...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe