On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Luis (wow, I didn't expect to see you here at
this hour!)
I was referring to the qualifications, benefits and limitations of the
different kinds of grant programs. The way that they're structured provides
some ups and downs for affiliates when we have the option to choose among
grant types. FDC/APG's structure recieved a lot of attention in the past
few years. I think it would be good to take a step back and look
collectively at the grants programs, and to think about how to engineer
them with today's environment, goals and tools for affiliates, small teams
and individual grantees in mind; and to think about transition points among
grant types.
I would love to talk with you more about this at the Wikimedia Conference
if possible (:
As WMF continues to focus on "integration" as a major theme in 2015, we'll
certainly be giving the big picture of all our grantmaking structures,
impact assessments, etc some further thought. Any updates to grant programs
would happen in consult with the committees and broader community, so you
can expect that the program officers and I will be having more
conversations on this topic with you all over the coming year (no sudden
changes, lots of measured thought).
Cheers,
Siko
Pine
On Apr 7, 2015 11:20 PM, "Luis Villa" <lvilla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Pine W
<wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Just noting that annual plans can go through APG or PEG, but the
> qualificattions and scope are different. Some chapers choose to
continue
with PEG
funding becuase it is more flexible. The main limiter on PEG
funding is that it will not pay for full time permanent staff; however
according to Meta it may pay for part time or temporary staff.
APGs and PEGs for annual plans are usually recurring, but PEG funds a
variety of programs in addition to annual plans.
This is the kind of conversation that I hope Luis and his team will be
considering holistically in the next several months.
Katy of course is part of my team, so we're here, having a conversation
:)
Can you elaborate a bit, Pine? You've done a
good job answering MZ's
question, so I'm not clear what conversation you meant to highlight -
simply suggestions on how to improve the pages MZ linked to, or...?
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Sr. Director of Community Engagement
Wikimedia Foundation
*Working towards a world in which every single human being can freely
share
in the sum of all knowledge.*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Siko Bouterse
Director of Community Resources
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
sbouterse(a)wikimedia.org
*Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. *
*Donate <https://donate.wikimedia.org> or click the "edit" button today,
and help us make it a reality!*