As always, every tool is developed thinking about Wikipedia and Commons,
never all the other sister projects!
What about those poor pixels?
Are they different from Commons pixels??!?!!1!
Luckily, today the WMF said otherwise:
see the "Sister projects" news here
Aubrey
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Pierre-Selim <pierre-selim(a)huard.info>
wrote:
2015-04-01 22:09 GMT+02:00 Marc A. Pelletier
<marc(a)uberbox.org>rg>:
On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote:
> This is only the beginning: next step is the measurement of cute
pixels,
encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels.
That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are
equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to
pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels
out of the FOV aren't worth as much!
Also, some historic pixels may be worth several newer ones. Pixel
valuation is an art as much as it is a science.
Thank you for your valuable input, we will think about it for next
iterations.
-- Marc
Ouais bon, poisson d'avril? :-)
:-)
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Pierre-Selim
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>