Many years ago... on en.wp, RamBot created thousands and thousands of
articles about towns and cities in the United States. Controversial at the
time but ultimately successful in 'seeding' the content in exactly the way
that Anders described.
Whenever I go to do some New Pages Patrol on en.wp these days, it seems
(purely from personal experience) that there are lots of articles about
places in India and south asia being written. It's very difficult to assess
these for duplicates, notability, verifiability... but there's clearly a
demand for writing these topics that bots could help with.
For things that have "inherent notability", such as towns registered in a
national census or those done by LsjBot, I'd love to see more bot-creation
going on.
Peace, love & metadata
On 17 September 2014 08:22, Peter Southwood <peter.southwood(a)telkomsa.net>
wrote:
Impressive piece of work. I agree, it is a lot easier
to expand on an
article with a well formatted stub than to create a new one if you are not
familiar with the process. I would like to see this procedure extended to
other Wikipedias, including en: for classes of article for which there is
consensus that an article should exist for each example, like for species.
Cheers,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Anders Wennersten
Sent: 17 September 2014 04:36 AM
To: wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Lsjbot+Bot Acadeny
Lsjbot has now completed its run of generating articles for all species,
with 310 000 on plants, making the total number generated above 1 300
000 (source used: Catalogue of Life). With Naskobot, having earlier
generated some 85 000 articles on Swedish lakes and French communes etc.,
the total botgenerated articles on svwp are now 1,4 M
The botgenerating efforts have received overwhelmingly positive feedback
from the svwp community, with comments like:
*for editors it has become more stimulating writing new articles on
related subjects. When we write of a place in Sweden we know that all
mentioned lakes have articles, making the article better and more correct
(no lakes mentioned are spelled incorrectly any longer). Also photo safaris
are more fun when all lakes, even very small ones, are relevant to take
photos of and include in articles *experts are more attracted
participating when they are guided to the stub from Google. Also we get
feedback it is much easier to enter information on Wikipedia when the base
skeleton is there already (taxobox, category, links in wikidata, picture,
base sourceref). We see an increasing number of University classes in
biology given he assignment to write (expand) articles on (not so known)
species
We are also gladdened by the hard numbers. Reader accesses show a healthy
increase even from our already high number. And a trend of a slight
decrease of editors has now turned into an increase. We can not say for
certain why and it could be temporary but we believe the botgenerated
articles has a part of this positive development.
Encouraged by this, we will now start what we call Bot Academy. A dozen of
our experienced editors will, with the support from WMSE, learn more of
running bots. First by sessions on basics, common knowledge stuff, in order
for us to be able to use bot as a complement in our editing efforts. And
after that we will have sessions for advanced use, taking in the learning
from Lsjbot and Naskobot, in order to see if also we can find areas where
we from excellent sources can generate articles.
For 2015 we are contemplating the following botgenerating efforts *lsj
(sverker) will support other versions interested to run Lsjbot. He is now
in discussion with Farsi and Arabic wp, where there are some interesting
technical challenges related to the different alphabeticscript *we will
scan best practices of bot generation on other versions (it, nl, id, vt,
serbocroatia, farsi, ru etc) (it seems we have nothing to learn of this
from the biggest seven...) *lsj will look into using the database used by
Swedish libraries, with info of authors and books. Would it be feasible to
generate articles on authors?
*for myself I am continuing my initiative with the aim of fully integrate
100000 article of Swedish geographic entities with wikidata, in order to
by the end to generate, if wanted, up to 100000 articles related to
Swedish geography on 200 other versions. There is a lot needed of quality
improvement of the articles first and also the Wikidata must get better
before this can work, but perhaps it will be possible to get this going for
a subset of articles in 2015 even if the full set will take some years
longer before being ready to deploy
Anders
for examples, press "slumpartikel" (random artiicle) on
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Huvudsida
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4015/8223 - Release Date: 09/16/14
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>