On Sep 10, 2014 5:11 AM, "Keegan Peterzell" <keegan.wiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Wil Sinclair <wllm(a)wllm.com> wrote:
FWIW, I signed my first comment by hand. I missed the comments about
sigs in the wikitext editor interface. If it weren't for my family
situation, I'm pretty sure I would have bailed. In any case, it was
much easier to engage at WO, and that was partly- but not mostly- due
to the fact that they run discussion software over there.
,Wil
This - signing by hand - is pretty much a universal experience for new
users, myself included.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Alaska&diff=…
I'm not saying that isn't crap and unwelcoming: it is, and it deters new
users. But it's hardly the end of the world either. By signing the wrong
way no real harm is done, if someone just tells you about the option to use
~~~~
It's crap and archaic and should be fixed, but it's also an example of the
idea that there are no mistakes on a wiki. So you did something not right?
Great, that means you contributed. So we fix it (collaboratively) and
improve your contribution, no harm done.
That said, auto sign and a reply button would be a *whole* lot friendlier
than what we have now, and would be great improvements over the current
situation.
Flow definitely has a reply button, and automatic signing as well, but I
can't help but think that just those features in isolation would be better
then completely overhauling talk pages.
--Martijn
This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address
is in a personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>