Hoi,
The central point Diego made starts from is that the current broken system
has a POTENTIAL for unstructured, unaccountable changes by whomever.
You do not build on a fundament that is collapsing as it is. A system that
is manifestly broken particularly on the one platform where our new users
are; mobile.
If we are to take arguments seriously, please explain why we should in this
instance. If dismissing such ideas makes him go away AFTER it has been
explained why the arguments do not wash.. Well, the best that can be said
is that it makes the conversation easier, it does not change the quality of
the arguments at all.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 September 2014 09:55, Wil Sinclair <wllm(a)wllm.com> wrote:
Your
suggestion is to be dismissed with prejudice because it is so
obviously wrong in so many ways.. I do not care about a possible
potential
of a broken system at all I may want to think
about features that are
actively used in this broken system.
Thanks,
GerardM
I won't be dismissing it, because Diego makes some very good points
and articulates the concerns that many in the community have expressed
well.
Dismissing his ideas won't make them go away. I just hope that
dismissing them with that prejudice you mentioned doesn't make him go
away.
,Wil
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>