Erik Möller wrote:
> It's [Flow is] a system in early development,
and has never been
advertised as anything else.
======
*This statement is simply not true.*
See the WMF's 2014-15 annual plan:
https://archive.org/details/WikimediaFoundation2014-15AnnualPlan
Page 20 (DIRECT QUOTE FOLLOWS):
*FLOW*
* Current state (June 2014): Flow is an experimental but already feature
rich alternative to talk pages which can be enabled by WMF on a per-page
basis and is currently used in production on a small number of 'real world'
pages, including a couple of WikiProjects and feedback pages for new
features.
*Key Milestones*
* We will aim to cover one major set of new deployments per quarter,
carefully picking use cases. Example use cases may include: additional
WikiProjects, shared conversation spaces like Teahouse and Village Pump,
entire wikis willing to switch to Flow, etc. Success will be reflected in
adoption/participation metrics, targeting improved participation dynamics
relative to talk pages.
* By the end of the fiscal year [i.e. June 30, 2015 --t.d.], we expect to
cover one major use case thoroughly (e.g. all user talk pages, all Village
Pump type pages, etc.)
* By the end of the fiscal year [i.e. June 30, 2015. --t.d.], the team will
be a multi-device team, ready to maintain and develop the user experience
for phones, tablets, and desktops.
(END QUOTE)
It is shocking to see an assertion from WMF's VP of Engineering and Product
Development that Flow has been consistently portrayed by WMF as nothing
more than "a system in early development." In actual fact, it has been
portrayed as more or less finished software heading for a rollout in the
near future, as the above clearly illustrates.
Tim Davenport
"Carrite" on En-WP /// "Randy from Boise" on WPO
Corvallis, OR (USA)