Looks like Extension:MoodBar aka FeedbackDashboard, which was enabled on
enwiki for some time.
Am 24.11.2014 22:26 schrieb "svetlana" <svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au>au>:
Think I can run an instance of
https://github.com/mozilla/fjord on Labs
and have various Wikimedia projects (Wikis and Chapters) point to it in
their sidebar. A universal "Leave Feedback" link.
It would take people to a page similar to
https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback, with an appropriate disclaimer:
"If you need help or have a problem with Firefox, please visit Firefox
Support." We could be able to customize it for each project to fit our
needs. (Include aggressive pointers to OTRS queues and village pumps for
each project, as appropriate).
Thoughts?
--
svetlana
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, at 08:19, svetlana wrote:
I maintain that I would love to have a formal
universal feedback channel
for Chapters work. It has to be drama-free, but
transparent, and not
moderated.
Feedback is occasionally not negative, and may contain thorough project
ideas.
--
svetlana
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 18:03, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> As there is this constant call for more paper work for chapters, it
has to
> be understood that this is exactly what
kills the productivity of
chapters.
> There are always more people with their
opinion why this that or the
other
> is amiss. They all have their arguments why
they think they are right
and
> consequently contribute to the noise level
that is already way too
high.
>
> If anything we should look for ways of appreciating the effect of
chapters
> that does not make them beholden to every
John Dick AND Harry and at
the
> same time gives them equal space to move as
effectively as the
Wikimedia
> Foundation itself.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 23 November 2014 at 23:02, svetlana <svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au>
wrote:
>
> > To clarify: I would like to see a more strong mechanism for review of
> > Chapters work. This includes thorough feedback channels about how
Chapters
> > communicate, how they spend their
funding. Including means to
dissolve a
> > Chapter if a large chunk of people
believes it is not working well
(such
> > as, providing inadequate support to the
Wikimedia movement).
> >
> > This feedback channel is probably not here, but I feel this list
could
be
> > an appropriate place to discuss how the
above could be implemented.
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 08:28, svetlana wrote:
> > > I disagree, the question raised is relevant to the Wikimedia
movement as
> > a whole.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 02:37, Austin Hair wrote:
> > > > Fae,
> > > >
> > > > Please do not drag this list into whatever trouble you've found
> > > > yourself in on another. Wikimedia-l is neither a court of
appeals for
> > > > Wikimedia-related lists nor a
bullhorn for your personal
grievances.
> > > >
> > > > Austin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Darcy,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am concerned at what appears to be deliberate suppression of
> > > > > questions raising governance related issues from the wikimedia
UK
> > > > > email list. The email
below is an example. The list was always
> > > > > intended to be independent of the UK chapter, though one of the
> > > > > moderators is one of your employees.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please confirm that neither you, nor your employees,
are
> > > > > manipulating this public
list to your political advantage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Fae
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > From: Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com>
> > > > > Date: 18 November 2014 at 19:24
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Welcome ro D'Arcy Myers
> > > > > To: UK Wikimedia mailing list <
wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> > > > > Cc: geniice(a)gmail.com,
Harry Mitchell <hjmitchell(a)ymail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be nice to hear from the board how this was discussed
before
> > > > > offering the interim
position. After all, in the several
interviews I
> > > > > took part in for WMUK
staff, pretty much the first basic
question was
> > > > > along the lines of
'have you ever edited Wikipedia?' as a way
of
> > > > > assessing what the
candidate knows about Wikimedia; so I can
not
> > > > > believe this would come
as a surprise considering how
sensitive the
> > > > > board is on COI and its
perception by our community.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fae
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 18 November 2014 19:13, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 18 November 2014 18:55, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> [[user:Dcfmyers]] has no other edits.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> whoops missed a couple of deleted ones 2 edits to [[George
More
> > O'Ferrall]]. A direct copy and
paste of
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/527160/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In fairness copyright is a pretty blameless error for new
editors
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> geni
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> > > > >> wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
> > > > >>
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> > > > >> WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>