On 24/05/2014, Wil Sinclair wllm@wllm.com wrote: ...
Others are uncomfortable because the incoming ED has a partner who is active in the community, and that is a new thing.
No, churning politics off-wiki and then bringing issues raised off-wiki on-wiki, is not being active in the community, presuming you mean the community who actually enjoy contributing to Wikimedia projects.
I suggest we set the words aside for the time being and start letting our actions speak for themselves.
Yes, good strategy, let's do it.
Apart from a few minutes responding on this email thread, yesterday I sorted out some "missing" very large images of 19th C. cartoons[1] which have been part of a pattern of problematic tiffs under discussion on bugzilla, and today I have been checking up on some tricky conflicting sources for the Warren Cup article in the hope to eventually get it to Good Article status regardless of it including a depiction of anal sex.[2] These are the sort of content based mildly contentious, but positive, action that everyone likes to see. I'll get on with them.
Links 1. http://tools.wmflabs.org/catscan2/quick_intersection.php?lang=commons&pr... 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Cup
Fae