David, just out of curiosity, do you actually read most posts on this mailing list? Or monitor Commons? I'll be typing up an additional response on Commons later today as I have the time but the last time you asked why I wasn't engaging on Commons the answer was, quite literally, because I hadn't finished typing my post on commons yet, and had it up within five minutes of your post (and hadn't seen your post until after I had it up.) Could you please point out again where I'm refusing to engage with the community in question?
In the meantime, I'd still love to hear the reasonable articulation that this wasn't a violation of POLA that you keep seeming to suggest exists.
---- Kevin Gorman
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2014 20:47, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
I think David was reacting to your bold assertion that the next time you determine Commons has violated a Board resolution, drastic action would
be
taken. This suggests some certainty on your part that the Board and stewards agree with your judgment. I haven't seen evidence of that. You
can
certainly advocate that action be taken, but dire warnings of certain consequences seem a bit beyond your authority to issue.
I was more disagreeing with the implicit claim that this was such an obvious slam dunk that Kevin could get action on it while explicitly refusing to engage with the community in question, literally on the grounds that he'd previously been so disruptive they'd spoken of banning him. That last bit really doesn't suggest the case is very strong.
- d.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe