On 13 May 2014 20:47, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
I think David was reacting to your bold assertion that the next time you determine Commons has violated a Board resolution, drastic action would be taken. This suggests some certainty on your part that the Board and stewards agree with your judgment. I haven't seen evidence of that. You can certainly advocate that action be taken, but dire warnings of certain consequences seem a bit beyond your authority to issue.
I was more disagreeing with the implicit claim that this was such an obvious slam dunk that Kevin could get action on it while explicitly refusing to engage with the community in question, literally on the grounds that he'd previously been so disruptive they'd spoken of banning him. That last bit really doesn't suggest the case is very strong.
- d.