There is also the article I wrote for the 'Other Place' here http://wikipediocracy.com/2014/05/04/the-sum-of-the-parts , also on the subject of indiscriminate copying and pasting from older reference sources.
The point is that any study of Wikipedia article 'reliability' should be careful about the provenance of the article. The Wycliffe is barely more than a copy and paste of an old (and somewhat outdated) source.
On 08/05/2014 09:24, edward wrote:
The study that Erik refers to here http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-May/071565.html was seriously flawed.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/language-blog/bal-dont-trust-wikipedia-on-a...