Makes sense to me too. Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Alexander" jamesofur@gmail.com To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:12 PM Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] the big red notice on the top of http://strategy.wikimedia.org - done
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Bohdan Melnychuk base-w@yandex.ru wrote:
But we close wiki. We not set wiki read only. Why should we use another therm than the procedure is called?
Because what we DO (no matter what we call it) is set it as Read Only, it is still 100% accessible you just can't edit it. I think it does make sense that 'read-only' is more understandable then 'close' which sounds like we completely shut it off and you can't read it either.
James _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe