On 2 March 2014 16:56, Mark delirium@hackish.org wrote:
On 3/2/14, 5:31 PM, Chris McKenna wrote:
There is a further disconnect in that Commons is taking an increasingly ultra-conservative approach to the definition of "Free", whereas most other projects are working to a definition of "Free for all practical purposes". It is the latter interpretation that the board, in consultation with the legal team, are recommending as the way forward but is being resisted strongly by many on Commons.
This is more the crux of the issue, I think. I'm mostly familiar with en.wiki, but on there the definition swings pretty far to the opposite extreme, with a lot of content that is *not* Free for most practical purposes.
This discussion is not even about en:wp or its content; you are derailing the discussion.
- d.