I appreciate this, WWB, especially after the grilling I gave you about
proposed edits to the Hedge fund article! The fact that you and your
clients are persistent, willing to be open about your associations, and
willing to abide by Wikimedia's CoI's standards even if it makes adding
content take a lot longer, is a big plus. I hope you, your clients, and
Wikipedia will mutually benefit from this in the long run.
Pine
Pine
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Bishakha Datta <bishakhadatta(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:05 AM, William Beutler
<
williambeutler(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi, everybody. Longtime lurker, first time
writing to the list—the first
in
a few years at least.
You may have seen some news coverage today about an initiative from a
group
of public relations, marketing, and
communications agencies offering a
statement, posted as a user essay on Wikipedia, stating in a public way
their intention to follow Wikipedia's rules—especially regarding
WP:COI—to
educate themselves more about Wikipedia, and
educate their colleagues and
clients in turn.
Thank you for posting this. It was a pleasant surprise and seems like a
sound and constructive approach to this issue.
Best
Bishakha
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>