On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Todd Allen <toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this
to any greater degree
than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK
"superinjunctions"?
First, WMF operates globally, and while I took pains as general
counsel, just as the WMF legal team does now, to limit exposure around
the world, it is a mistake to suppose that jurisdictional protections
are invariably impenetrable. See my discussion here on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqQOvxyj66w .
Second, the ECJ decision can be used to go after editors individually,
or organized WMF-affiliated groups.
--Mike