The mother bless us ,
my all Dearer ,
as you know , all is well , but everyone can not feel as all , so please change your
feeling and expresion .
Thanks ,
+91-9307788333
wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
>Send Wikimedia-l mailing list submissions to
> wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> wikimedia-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Wikimedia-l digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: AFD survey (Fæ)
> 2. Re: AFD survey (Amir E. Aharoni)
> 3. Re: AFD survey (Marc A. Pelletier)
> 4. Re: Lsjbot i Wall street jpournal and BBC world (Ilario Valdelli)
> 5. On historical event / WMRS Microgrants 2014 (Milos Rancic)
> 6. Re: On historical event / WMRS Microgrants 2014 (Jon Davies)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:02:30 +0100
>From: Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com>
>To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] AFD survey
>Message-ID:
> <CAH7nnD3ddsG4HK-w85j+J=nU5zDEBXR-iEE=haL86WdxHhaG5w(a)mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>On 16 July 2014 12:39, Lane Rasberry <lane(a)bluerasberry.com> wrote:
>...
>> I asked this researcher to discontinue the survey pending a check on the
>> impact of it on the Wikipedia community. I said this because I feel they
>> are out of compliance with even the soft suggestions in research that are
>> available, and they know this.
>
>Good point. If anyone wanted to research deletion discussion patterns
>and outcomes on the English Wikipedia or other projects, I could knock
>out a nice analysis using a little passive but intelligent bot work
>depending on their requirements. I'm easy to find.
>
>I'm pretty sure this would be a lot cheaper in volunteer time or
>research time than creating surveys to answer very similar questions,
>particularly if the resulting report were freely published so that
>volunteers could give their "subjective value responses" to that
>instead.
>
>Fae
>--
>faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:48 +0300
>From: "Amir E. Aharoni" <amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il>
>To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] AFD survey
>Message-ID:
> <CACtNa8tHeMQRxjnsGHdHDG5B=BX0BsMe4HwSt0GVWp18=84pQQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>Good points, Lane. Such things were possibly discussed before, but it's the
>first time that I see it it spelled out like this.
>
>This approach should be advertised a bit somehow, so that the researchers
>know how to do it ethically and for everybody's benefit, and so that the
>experienced Wikipedians would know not to start answering such surveys.
>
>
>--
>Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
>http://aharoni.wordpress.com
>“We're living in pieces,
>I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
>
>
>2014-07-16 14:39 GMT+03:00 Lane Rasberry <lane(a)bluerasberry.com>om>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I feel that this is an unethical research project and I have told the
>> researcher so. We exchanged several emails and were unable to understand
>> each other. I asked them to please have their university ethics board
>> contact me.
>>
>> I asked the researcher about RCOM and other things. This person said they
>> posted to RCOM, but "the Meta page states that submissions should receive
>> responses within 1-2 weeks, and yet our messages went unanswered. We have
>> institutional ethics approval, but that doesn't last indefinitely, and so
>> after receiving no response we opted to go ahead."
>>
>> I am not going to share more than