And you assert that I personally did all those things ?
And you do not acknowledge then IAC is an actual public movement / organisation, with tens of thousands of subscribers all connected by internet and with similar ideologies, all upset with Wikipedia. eg. like Eastern European mailing list, Church of Scientology etc.
Unlike them, my client is only concerned with a single article "India Against Corruption" from which the chief author, "Sitush", backed out during the agreed mediation and could not defend his malicious edits, leading to this surge of indignation being expressed against Wikipedia and off it.
We await a reply from OTRS or Ms.Tretikov's office to our client's emails reporting the IP infringements.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/14/14, Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2014-12-14 14:05, Bruentrup wrote:
And that will magically make all the infringements of IAC's IP at Commons somehow acceptable and usable ?
If you have reliable hard evidence of disruption and "socking" by / against IAC, carried out from India, please share it with us so that my clients can report it to the law enforcement agencies, as they regularly do, to identify and prosecute the culprits.
Please report yourself to the law enforcement agency first for spooling this mailing list last week and adding people to a google group without their consent (and for acting so using the name of a different list contributor).
In the English Wikipedia, I personally blocked from editing several accounts from your sockfarm.
I do not see why I should be wasting more time for IAC.
Thank you for your attention.
Cheers Yaroslav
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe