On 21.08.2014 15:24, Risker wrote:
On 21 August 2014 09:18, Yaroslav M. Blanter
<putevod(a)mccme.ru> wrote:
On 21.08.2014 14:26, Risker wrote:
On 21 August 2014 05:31, Strainu
<strainu10(a)gmail.com> wrote:
...
Many of these templates have over
100 links in them; a surprisingly
large
number have "subtemplates" built into them. I'm having a hard time
seeing
how adding all those links at the bottom of an article is actually
going to
help that much. Unless we have some evidence to confirm this
information is
actually useful to readers -seriously, this is a community-designed
feature
targeted at readers as opposed to editors - it's probably time to
rethink
what indirectly related information on our article pages is made
routinely
available. We want people to use our information, not give up because
it
takes too long to load.
Risker/Anne
Right, and if the feature is not useful for readers (and I do not see
how it is useful for editors, except for making the pages looking nicer)
it possibly should not be there at all. But I do not think that just
ignoring it in the mobile version without any relation to the "desktop"
version is a good direction to follow.
Cheers
Yaroslav