On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana <svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is
because they care very
much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on
WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against
the other party
"Using force" could equally well apply to implementing a feature without
sufficient buy-in, and then refusing to roll it back when so requested.
The WMF's basis for concluding that readers are better served with the MV
than without it is riddled with holes, as exhaustively explained elsewhere.
You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about
accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among
other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the
encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages?
Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]