magnus, a vote always has 3 options.
* i am for it
* i am against it
* i can live with the outcome of the vote
so i did not vote. because i can live with both. but i do respect the vote.
i do respect admin decisions, i even voted for some admins.
at the end it is very simple. the one who produces software has a conflict
of interest. so this person or organisation is not in a good position to
decide when it is used.
wmf, its employees and voluntary officers need to be exemplary with respect
to conflicts of interest, imo. always. errors are allowed as well as
excuses of course.
magnus you said you are not happy with media viewer. and you always produce
software people like. what should they improve?
rupert
Am 12.08.2014 14:45 schrieb "Magnus Manske"
<magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>om>:
Also, 118 people (190 vs. 72 votes in the
"poll" [1] on German Wikipedia)
are not "the community". They are a small part of the community.
The people who would profit [2] from the Media Viewer as a default feature
were not consulted.
Cheers,
Magnus
[1]
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meinungsbilder/Medienbetrachter
[2] Value of ""profit" TBD
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Peter Southwood <
peter.southwood(a)telkomsa.net> wrote:
As one has been there, done that, I would like to
point out that there is
an order of magnitude difference between Internet Brands and WMF.
Cheers,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Yaroslav M.
Blanter
Sent: 12 August 2014 02:00 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect user right, Comming to a wiki
near
you
On 12.08.2014 02:26, svetlana wrote:
If we accept the policy in principle, I don't
care who enforces such
policy, that be community or WMF. Such policy does not go against
community entirely, unless WMF shows a will to reject community
patches related to issues which community finds important. Whether or
not this is the case, I don't care; it's a website in their hands and
they're welcome to shut it off without notice, or to experiment at
leisure.
svetlana
Whoever believes that an administration of a crowdsourcing website can do
whatever they want just because they are running the website should
recollect what recently happened to Internet Brands and Wikitravel.
Cheers
Yaroslav
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4744 / Virus Database: 4007/8020 - Release Date: 08/11/14
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>