On July 7th, Katherine Maher of the WMF said that they had not received any
notifications and had not made a decision as to how or whether to publicize
them. She did say that she thought it would be on next year's transparency
report (the first instance of which either came out recently or is coming
out shortly). My guess is the report will only describe these notifications
in aggregate.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 05/08/2014, John Mark Vandenberg
<jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
...
We have a reply:
https://twitter.com/JulietteGarside/status/496644233580003328
"@jayvdb @guardian @Wikipedia @wikisignpost We won't know unless
Wikipedia chooses to make that information public"
Unless I'm missing something, this means that WMF senior management
can tell us exactly which Wikipedia articles are "suppressed" after
RTV requests to Google.
What do we (the unpaid volunteer community) want to do with this
information? Ethically this is difficult territory, but openness is
one of our core values, so this should not all be stitched up in
back-rooms without explaining what is going on to the whole community
and aiming for a consensus on action.
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>