Well, Fae, since the only place that Adam Osborne is mentioned in Wikipedia is as the son of his father, and it does not mention anything more than his name, I am pretty certain that you're mistaken. The exact quote from the Guardian is:
"Google has already begun to implement the ruling, with tens of thousands
of links removed from its European search results to sites ranging from the BBC to the *Daily Express*. Among the data now "hidden" from Google is an article about the 2009 Muslim conversion of Adam Osborne, brother of the chancellor, George Osborne."
Nothing in that quote says that it is a Wikipedia article that is "hidden".
Risker/Anne
On 3 August 2014 00:12, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2014 23:49, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure you're correct about what is being "disappeared", Fae. I believe that the Guardian is referring to an article of theirs that is
now
not seen in Google search results for certain terms. The article makes
it
pretty clear that The Guardian does not known which article is involved.
Risker/Anne
The Guardian states in the first paragraph that: "Google is set to restrict search terms to a link to a Wikipedia article, in the first request under Europe's controversial new "right to be forgotten" legislation to affect the 110m-page encyclopaedia."
"Wikipedia" cannot be misread as the "Guardian newspaper".
Fae
faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe