Well, Fae, since the only place that Adam Osborne is mentioned in Wikipedia
is as the son of his father, and it does not mention anything more than his
name, I am pretty certain that you're mistaken. The exact quote from the
Guardian is:
"Google has already begun to implement the ruling, with tens of thousands
of links removed from its European search results to
sites ranging from the
BBC to the *Daily Express*. Among the data now "hidden" from Google is an
article about the 2009 Muslim conversion of Adam Osborne, brother of the
chancellor, George Osborne."
Nothing in that quote says that it is a Wikipedia article that is
"hidden".
Risker/Anne
On 3 August 2014 00:12, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 August 2014 23:49, Risker
<risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure you're correct about what is
being "disappeared", Fae. I
believe that the Guardian is referring to an article of theirs that is
now
not seen in Google search results for certain
terms. The article makes
it
pretty clear that The Guardian does not known
which article is involved.
Risker/Anne
The Guardian states in the first paragraph that:
"Google is set to restrict search terms to a link to a Wikipedia
article, in the first request under Europe's controversial new "right
to be forgotten" legislation to affect the 110m-page encyclopaedia."
"Wikipedia" cannot be misread as the "Guardian newspaper".
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>