Imo having a centralized funding model is very good against corruption (we had a couple of cases already and unfortunately we will some in the future)
As a side comment, it would be nice if we could learn the total donations/country figures ( for example: Hungary 2013: $12,345.67) If this info is already public then sorry, I was unable to locate it myself.
Balazs
2014-04-10 16:20 GMT+02:00 mathias.damour@laposte.net:
Hi,
Message du 10/04/14 15:28 De : "Anders Wennersten" A : wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Copie à : Objet : Re: [Wikimedia-l] Funding of decentralized organizational
structure
(...) And I would be unhappy if the divergence between project became too big, POV paid editing etc we will be stronger as a totality if we abide to the same base guidelines So I question your urge and need to decentralize. For am as a contributer the most important part is that I know my inputs is securely stored and will not be misused by actors like google or plain advertising. And for this reason I believe in a centralized structure as about today (for now) Anders
I don't tink that Ting Chen is disputing that the WMF should keep the core work. Yet the core work may mean about 20% of the movement resources instead of 90%...
Mathias [[User:Astirmays]]
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe