Thankyou from me as well, it's refreshing to see such a candid summary of the failings that occurred in this case, and to see the Foundation taking responsibility for those. I hope that the opportunity can be taken for all of us to learn from this so that it does not happen with future projects.
Cheers, Craig
On 1 April 2014 15:27, Liam Wyatt liamwyatt@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2014 16:22, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Sue Gardner wrote:
For everyone: following up on Erik's e-mail, the WMF has done a postmortem of the Belfer situation, which I've just posted at the link from Erik above. Suffice to say here that we implemented the Belfer Wikipedian-in-Residence project with editing as a core activity of the WIR role, despite internal and external voices strongly advising us not to. That was a mistake, and we shouldn't have done it.
Thank you for taking the time to put the postmortem together. I've been very impressed with and appreciate the candor and thoughtfulness that
have
gone into the responses to this discussion. Growing pains are still pains, of course, but I'm hopefully optimistic that the Wikimedia Foundation is learning from its experiences, good and bad, as it matures.
MZMcBride
Let me second that sentiment. Thank you Sue, Erik et al. at the WMF.
While I'm sure there will be ongoing discussions about this topic on the mailing lists and on-wiki, I too am heartened by the genuine concern, non-defensiveness (in the face of criticism - including mine), and willingness to investigate this issue.
Sincerely, -Liam / Wittylama
wittylama.com Peace, love & metadata _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe