It sounds great, but for widespread acceptance you're going to have to
dumb it down. Avoid words like "conjecture" and "debate". Maybe
"idea"
and "discussion" or something :)
I couldn't agree with you more. I've actually gone through many iterations
of descriptive words for the elements, including changing the structure so
that a conjecture was actually a question (because some people think it's
impossible to improve on socratic method). The current set of words are
specifically for describing the idea to people who might be able to actually
implement it, not for describing it to people who might want to use it.
They most specifically convey the meaning. For a working version, I expect
things to be described by people who know how to teach ideas to people, not
those who know how to implement them.
Do you have any working prototypes?
I wish I did. For the past two years I've had so much on my plate that the
edges of the plate have been cracking off. I've started and stalled the
project several times in the past five years, and I just had to admit that
I'll never get it done on my own. However, I continue to have great faith
in this tool's ability to help people achieve greater harmony, so I continue
to look around for others who might be able to help.