Wikitech-l March 2014

wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org

188 participants
230 discussions

How to make commits from mirrored Wikimedia repos show up on your GitHub profile
by Bartosz Dziewoński 27 Jun '24

27 Jun '24

I know it has been annoying a couple of people other than me, so now that I've learned how to make it work I'll share the knowledge here. tl;dr: Star the repositories. No, seriously. (And yes, you need to star each extension repo separately.) (Is there a place on mw.org to put this tidbit on?) ------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Brian Levine" <support(a)github.com> (GitHub Staff) To: matma.rex(a)gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: Commits in mirrored repositories not showing up on my profile Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:47:19 +0200 Hi Bartosz In order to link your commits to your GitHub account, you need to have some association with the repository other than authoring the commit. Usually, having push access gives you that connection. In this case, you don't have push permission, so we don't link you to the commit. The easy solution here is for you to star the repository. If you star it - along with the other repositories that are giving you this problem - we'll see that you're connected to the repository and you'll get contribution credit for those commits. Cheers Brian -- Matma Rex

3 3

New RFC: better JS minification
by Max Semenik 01 Nov '15

01 Nov '15

Hi, I'd like to present a new RFC for your consideration: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Minifier It is about how we can shave 10-15% off the size if JavaScript delivered to users. Your comments are highly welcome!:) -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])

9 12

Re: [Wikitech-l] Bug in the Wikipedia main web page
by Sukyoung Ryu 24 May '15

24 May '15

Thank you for the quick fix! Best, -- Sukyoung On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Nathan wrote: > FYI in case you aren't subscribed to the list. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Yair Rand <yyairrand(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:25 PM > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Bug in the Wikipedia main web page > To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> > > > Thank you for pointing out this bug. Your suggested change to > MediaWiki:Gadget-wm-portal.js has been implemented by Meta-Wiki > administrator User:PiRSquared17. > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sukyoung Ryu <sukyoung.ryu(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > We are researchers at KAIST in Korea working on finding JavaScript bugs in > > web pages. While analyzing top websites from Alexa.com, we found an issue, > > which seems to be a bug, on the Wikipedia main web page (wikipedia.org). > > We would be grateful if you can either confirm that it is a bug and even > > better fix it or let us know what we're missing. > > > > Here's the issue. When a user selects a language in which search results > > are displayed via the language selection button from the Wikipedia main web > > page, the following JavaScript function is executed: > > > > 1 function setLang(lang) { > > 2 var uiLang = navigator.language || navigator.userLanguage, date > > = new Date(); > > 3 > > 4 if (uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang) { > > 5 date.setTime(date.getTime() - 1); > > 6 } else { > > 7 date.setFullYear(date.getFullYear() + 1); > > 8 } > > 9 > > 10 document.cookie = "searchLang=" + lang + ";expires=" + > > date.toUTCString() + ";domain=" + location.host + ";"; > > 11 } > > > > Depending on the evaluation result of the conditional expression on line > > 4, "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang", the function leaves or dose not leave > > the selected language information on the user's computer through a cookie. > > But we found that the expression, "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang", always > > evaluates to false, which results in that the function always leaves > > cookies on users' computers. We think that changing the contidional > > expression, "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang", to the expression, > > "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) == lang", will solve the problem. > > > > This problem may occur in the main web pages of all the Wikimedia sites. > > Could you kindly let us know what you think? Thank you in advance. > > > > Best, > > Changhee Park and Sukyoung Ryu > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >

3 3

People with knowledge of English swear words needed :o
by Petr Bena 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

Are you good in swearing? WE NEED YOU Huggle 3 comes with vandalism-prediction as it is precaching the diffs even before they are enqueued including their contents. Each edit has so called "score" which is a numerical value that if higher, the edit is more likely a vandalism. If you want to help us improve this feature, it is necessary to define a "score words" list for every wiki where huggle is about to be used, for example on English wiki. Each list has following syntax: (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Huggle/Config&diff=573…) score-words(score): list of words separated by comma, can contain newlines but comma must be present example score-words(200): these, are, some, words, which, presence, of, increases, the, score, each, word, by, 200, So, if you know english better than me, which you likely do, go ahead and improve the configuration file there, no worries, huggle's config parser is very syntax-error proof. If you have any other suggestion how to improve huggle's prediction, go ahead and tell us!

8 8

Feedback for mediawiki api development course on codecademy.
by Diwanshi Pandey 26 Jul '14

26 Jul '14

Hello everyone, I am Diwanshi Pandey, an OPW intern. I'd like to have your feedback on the course I have created on codecademy for mediawiki api with help of my mentor Yuri Astrakhan. A little insight: The course is about parsing and querying mediawiki api. Initially we created one course which included 44 exercises but according to codecademy's guidelines their course are for beginners and should have maximum 30 exercises in one course. So we did a split up into two courses: One is Introduction to Wikipedia API<http://www.codecademy.com/courses/web-beginner-en-vj9nh/0/1>and other is Wikipedia:Query API <http://www.codecademy.com/courses/web-beginner-en-yd3lp/0/1>. Also due to api security and restrictions we couldn't implement tutorial on "editing wiki pages through api call" from a non wiki site yet. We are waiting till we find a good and easy way to demo that. Feedback may include: * Are the exercises easy to understand for novice users/developers? * Are changes needed in the look of exercises? * Are there any exercises which need not to be implemented or in too depth? * Any other thing? Thanks, -- *Regards,* *Diwanshi Pandey*

4 8

Notes from Architecture Summit (and call for wiki gnome help)
by Rob Lanphier 22 Jul '14

22 Jul '14

Hi everyone, A big thank you to everyone who participated in the Architecture Summit this year! We covered a lot of ground this year, and collectively learned a lot about how to put these things together. A lot of our work from this summit on this is only just beginning. Speaking of that, just the act of processing the notes is going to be the first step. MatmaRex and Legoktm pulled together a concise list of the etherpads here, which I've annotated with the corresponding agenda pages: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/Retrospective#Notes… Our next course of action is to get all of these copied to mediawiki.org to the agenda pages, so that we have a record of each session that will outlive Etherpad's temporary storage. I've done a little bit (the Architecture value, process, and guidelines discussion), but I'd love help from others on both getting it all copied in place, and wikifying it. Any takers? Those of you that couldn't make it, I'd encourage you to read through the notes We'll be discussing a lot of this over the coming days, so it'll be useful context to bring you up to speed on these things. Rob

3 4

Re: [Wikitech-l] MediaWiki to Latex Converter
by Fred Bauder 17 Jul '14

17 Jul '14

I have a log of what happens on when the commands: sudo apt-get install mediawiki2latex mediawiki2latex -u https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Ries -o AdamRies.pdf are entered on the command line of ubuntu (13.10) Better than TV... Happy to send it to anyone. Fred

6 11

Changes in API action=parse&mobileformat=...
by Max Semenik 09 Jun '14

09 Jun '14

Hi, in response to bug 54607 [1], we've changed the semantics of the mobileformat parameter to action=parse == Summary == Previously, it used to accept strings 'html' or 'wml', later just 'html' and modify the structure of output (see below). This was problematic because you needed to retrieve the HTML from output in different ways, depending on whether mobileformat is specified or not. Now, mobileformat is a boolean parameter, that is if there's a 'mobileformat' parameter in request, it will be treated as "the output should be mobile-friendly", regardless of value. And the output structure will be the same. For compatibility with older callers, mobileformat=(html|wml) will be special-cased to return the older structure at least for 6 month from now. These changes will start being rolled out to the WMF sites starting from tomorrow, Tuesday October 24th and this process will be complete by October 31st. == Examples == === Non-mobile parse === api.php?action=parse&format=xml { "parse": { "title": "...", "text": { "*": "foo" } } } api.php?action=parse&format=json <?xml version="1.0"?> <api> <parse title="..." displaytitle="..."> <text xml:space="preserve">foo</text> </parse> </api> === Parse that outputs mobile HTML, old style === api.php?action=parse&format=json&mobileformat=html { "parse": { "title": "API", "text": "foo" } } api.php?action=parse&format=xml&mobileformat=html <?xml version="1.0"?> <api> <parse title="..." text="foo" displaytitle="..."> </parse> </api> === Parse that outputs mobile HTML, new style === api.php?action=parse&format=...&mobileformat Same as for non-mobile parses. == FAQ == Q: I didn't use mobileformat before, does anything change for me? A: No. Q: I use mobileformat=html, will my bot/tool be broken now? A: No, you will have 6 months to switch to new style. Q: I'm only planning to use mobileformat, what should I do? A: Just use the new style. Q: How did this format discrepancy appear in the first place? A: To err is human. ----- [1] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54607 -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])

1 1

workflow to add multiple patches to gerrit.wikimedia.org:29418/operations/puppet.git
by Petr Bena 14 May '14

14 May '14

Currently I do: * clone a repo * setup git & hooks # patch 1: * apply my changes * commit * execute git-review # patch 2: * apply my changes * commit FAIL - the new commit it depending on previous commit - I can't push What am I supposed to do in order to push multiple separate patches? GIT-IDIOT way please, no long explanations, just commands and examples. Thanks

6 11

HTML templating systems & MediaWiki - is this summary right?
by Sumana Harihareswara 13 May '14

13 May '14

I'm trying to understand what our current situation is and what our choices are around HTML templating systems and MediaWiki, so I'm gonna note what I think I understand so far in this mail and then would love for people to correct me. TL;DR - did we already consense on a templating system and I just missed it? Description: An HTML templates system (also known as a templating engine) lets you (the programmer) write something that looks more like a document than it looks like code, then has hooks/entry points/macro substitution points (for user input and whatnot) that then invoke code, then emits finished HTML for the browser to render. Examples: PHP itself is kinda a templating language. In the PHP world, Smarty is a somewhat more mature/old-school choice. Mustache.js is a popular modern choice. And in other languages, you'd pick a lot of the MVC frameworks that are popular, e.g. Django or Jinja in Python. Spectrum of approaches: One approach treats HTML as a string ("here's a bunch of bytes to interpolate"). From a security perspective, this is dangerously easy to have vulnerabilities in, because you just naively insert strings. Then on the other end of the spectrum, you have code that always keeps the document object model (DOM) in memory, so the programmer is abstractly manipulating that data model and passing around an object. Sure, it spits out HTML in the end, but inherent in the method for turning those objects into HTML is a sanitization step, so that's inherently more secure. There's some discussion at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Parsoid/Round-trip_testing/Templates . I presume we want the latter, but that the former model is more performant? We talked about this stuff in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-02-21 and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Architecture_Summit_2014/HTML_templatin… . Based on that plus https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/RFC_clusters#HTML_t… it seems like we are supposed to get consensus on which system(s) to use, and we kind of have four things we could choose: * oojs - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/OOjs_UI -- could use this toolkit with one of the template approaches below, or maybe this is enough by itself! Currently used inside VisualEditor and I am not sure whether any other MediaWiki extensions or teams are using it? This is a DOM-based templating system. Template approaches which are competing?: * MVC framework - Wikia has written their own templating library that Wikia uses (Nirvana). Owen Davis is talking about this tomorrow in the RFC review meeting. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/MVC_framework * mustache.js stuff - Ryan Kaldari and Chris Steipp mentioned this I think? * Knockout-compatible implementation in Node.js & PHP https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/HTML_templating_library… and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/HTML_templating_library… , being worked on by Gabriel Wicke, Matt Walker, and others. DOM-based. There's also an OutputPage refactor suggested in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/OutputPage_refactor that's part of the HTML Templating RFC Cluster https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/RFC_clusters#HTML_t… . I guess my biggest question right now is whether I have all the big moving parts right in my summary above. Thanks. -- Sumana Harihareswara Senior Technical Writer Wikimedia Foundation

12 37

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Wikitech-l March 2014