Wikitech-l June 2014

wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org

139 participants
144 discussions

Missing Section Headings
by Marc Riddell 13 Sep '24

13 Sep '24

Hello, I have been a WP editor since 2006. I hope you can help me. For some reason I no longer have Section Heading titles showing in the Articles. This is true of all Headings including the one that carries the Article subject's name. When there is a Table of Contents, it appears fine and, when I click on a particular Section, it goes to that Section, but all that is there is a straight line separating the Sections. There is also no button to edit a Section. If I edit the page and remove the "== ==" markers from the Section Titles, the Title then shows up, but not as a Section Heading. Also, I don't have any Date separators on my Want List. This started 2 days ago. Any thoughts? Thanks, Marc Riddell [[User:Michael David]]

10 11

How to make commits from mirrored Wikimedia repos show up on your GitHub profile
by Bartosz Dziewoński 27 Jun '24

27 Jun '24

I know it has been annoying a couple of people other than me, so now that I've learned how to make it work I'll share the knowledge here. tl;dr: Star the repositories. No, seriously. (And yes, you need to star each extension repo separately.) (Is there a place on mw.org to put this tidbit on?) ------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Brian Levine" <support(a)github.com> (GitHub Staff) To: matma.rex(a)gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: Commits in mirrored repositories not showing up on my profile Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:47:19 +0200 Hi Bartosz In order to link your commits to your GitHub account, you need to have some association with the repository other than authoring the commit. Usually, having push access gives you that connection. In this case, you don't have push permission, so we don't link you to the commit. The easy solution here is for you to star the repository. If you star it - along with the other repositories that are giving you this problem - we'll see that you're connected to the repository and you'll get contribution credit for those commits. Cheers Brian -- Matma Rex

3 3

New RFC: better JS minification
by Max Semenik 01 Nov '15

01 Nov '15

Hi, I'd like to present a new RFC for your consideration: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Minifier It is about how we can shave 10-15% off the size if JavaScript delivered to users. Your comments are highly welcome!:) -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])

9 12

Re: [Wikitech-l] Bug in the Wikipedia main web page
by Sukyoung Ryu 24 May '15

24 May '15

Thank you for the quick fix! Best, -- Sukyoung On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Nathan wrote: > FYI in case you aren't subscribed to the list. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Yair Rand <yyairrand(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:25 PM > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Bug in the Wikipedia main web page > To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> > > > Thank you for pointing out this bug. Your suggested change to > MediaWiki:Gadget-wm-portal.js has been implemented by Meta-Wiki > administrator User:PiRSquared17. > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sukyoung Ryu <sukyoung.ryu(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > We are researchers at KAIST in Korea working on finding JavaScript bugs in > > web pages. While analyzing top websites from Alexa.com, we found an issue, > > which seems to be a bug, on the Wikipedia main web page (wikipedia.org). > > We would be grateful if you can either confirm that it is a bug and even > > better fix it or let us know what we're missing. > > > > Here's the issue. When a user selects a language in which search results > > are displayed via the language selection button from the Wikipedia main web > > page, the following JavaScript function is executed: > > > > 1 function setLang(lang) { > > 2 var uiLang = navigator.language || navigator.userLanguage, date > > = new Date(); > > 3 > > 4 if (uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang) { > > 5 date.setTime(date.getTime() - 1); > > 6 } else { > > 7 date.setFullYear(date.getFullYear() + 1); > > 8 } > > 9 > > 10 document.cookie = "searchLang=" + lang + ";expires=" + > > date.toUTCString() + ";domain=" + location.host + ";"; > > 11 } > > > > Depending on the evaluation result of the conditional expression on line > > 4, "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang", the function leaves or dose not leave > > the selected language information on the user's computer through a cookie. > > But we found that the expression, "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang", always > > evaluates to false, which results in that the function always leaves > > cookies on users' computers. We think that changing the contidional > > expression, "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) === lang", to the expression, > > "uiLang.match(/^\w+/) == lang", will solve the problem. > > > > This problem may occur in the main web pages of all the Wikimedia sites. > > Could you kindly let us know what you think? Thank you in advance. > > > > Best, > > Changhee Park and Sukyoung Ryu > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >

3 3

Upcoming jQuery upgrade (breaking change)
by Krinkle 01 Dec '14

01 Dec '14

Hey all, TL;DR: jQuery will soon be upgraded from v1.8.3 to v1.11.x (the latest). This major release removes deprecated functionality. Please migrate away from this deprecated functionality as soon as possible. It's been a long time coming but we're now finally upgrading the jQuery package that ships with MediaWiki. We used to regularly upgrade jQuery in the past, but got stuck at v1.8 a couple of years ago due to lack of time and concern about disruption. Because of this, many developers have needed to work around bugs that were already fixed in later versions of jQuery. Thankfully, jQuery v1.9 (and its v2 counterpart) has been the first release in jQuery history that needed an upgrade guide[1][2]. It's a major release that cleans up deprecated and dubious functionality. Migration of existing code in extensions, gadgets, and user & site scripts should be trivial (swapping one method for another, maybe with a slight change to the parameters passed). This is all documented in the upgrade guide[1][2]. The upgrade guide may look scary (as it lists many of your favourite methods), but they are mostly just addressing edge cases. == Call to action == This is a call for you, to: 1) Get familiar with http://jquery.com/upgrade-guide/1.9/. 2) Start migrating your code. jQuery v1.9 is about removing deprecated functionality. The new functionality is already present in jQuery 1.8 or, in some cases, earlier. 3) Look out for deprecation warnings. Once instrumentation has begun, using "?debug=true" will log jQuery deprecation warnings to the console. Look for ones marked "JQMIGRATE" [7]. You might also find deprecation notices from mediawiki.js, for more about those see the mail from last October [8]. == Plan == 1) Instrumentation and logging The first phase is to instrument jQuery to work out all the areas which will need work. I have started work on loading jQuery Migrate alongside the current version of jQuery. I expect that to land in master this week [6], and roll out on Wikimedia wikis the week after. This will enable you to detect usage of most deprecated functionality through your browser console. Don't forget the upgrade guide[1], as Migrate cannot detect everything. 2) Upgrade and Migrate After this, the actual upgrade will take place, whilst Migrate stays. This should not break anything since Migrate covers almost all functionality that will be removed. The instrumentation and logging will remain during this phase; the only effective change at this point is whatever jQuery didn't think was worth covering in Migrate or were just one of many bug fixes. 3) Finalise upgrade Finally, we will remove the migration plugin (both the Migrate compatibility layer and its instrumentation). This will bring us to a clean version of latest jQuery v1.x without compatibility hacks. A rough timeline: * 12 May 2014 (1.24wmf4 [9]): Phase 1 – Instrumentation and logging starts. This will run for 4 weeks (until June 9). * 19 May 2014 (1.24wmf5): Phase 2 – "Upgrade and Migrate". This will run for 3 weeks (upto June 9). The instrumentation continues during this period. * 1 June 2014 (1.24wmf7) Finalise upgrade. == FAQ == Q: The upgrade guide is for jQuery v1.9, what about jQuery v1.10 and v1.11? A: Those are regular updates that only fix bugs and/or introduce non-breaking enhancements. Like jQuery v1.7 and v1.8, we can upgrade to those without any hassle. We'll be fast-forwarding straight from v1.8 to v1.11. Q: What about the jQuery Migrate plugin? A: jQuery developed a plugin that adds back some of the removed features (not all, consult the upgrade guide[2] for details). It also logs usage of these to the console. Q: When will the upgrade happen? A: In the next few weeks, once we are happy that the impact is reasonably low. An update will be sent to wikitech-l just before this is done as a final reminder. This will be well before the MediaWiki 1.24 branch point for extension authors looking to maintain compatibility. Q: When are we moving to jQuery v2.x? A: We are not currently planing to do this. Despite the name, jQuery v2.x doesn't contain any new features compared to jQuery v1 [3]. The main difference is in the reduced support for different browsers and environments; most noticeably, jQuery 2.x drops support for Internet Explorer 8 and below, which MediaWiki is still supporting for now, and is outside the scope of this work. Both v1 and v2 continue to enjoy simultaneous releases for bug fixes and new features. For example, jQuery released v1.11 and v2.1 together[4][5]. -- Krinkle [1] http://blog.jquery.com/2013/01/15/jquery-1-9-final-jquery-2-0-beta-migrate- final-released/ [2] http://jquery.com/upgrade-guide/1.9/ [3] http://blog.jquery.com/2013/04/18/jquery-2-0-released/ [4] http://blog.jquery.com/2014/01/24/jquery-1-11-and-2-1-released/ [5] http://blog.jquery.com/2013/05/24/jquery-1-10-0-and-2-0-1-released/ [6] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/131494 [7] https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate/blob/master/warnings.md [8] http://www.mail-archive.com/wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org/msg72198.html [9] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_1.24/Roadmap

6 14

People with knowledge of English swear words needed :o
by Petr Bena 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

Are you good in swearing? WE NEED YOU Huggle 3 comes with vandalism-prediction as it is precaching the diffs even before they are enqueued including their contents. Each edit has so called "score" which is a numerical value that if higher, the edit is more likely a vandalism. If you want to help us improve this feature, it is necessary to define a "score words" list for every wiki where huggle is about to be used, for example on English wiki. Each list has following syntax: (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Huggle/Config&diff=573…) score-words(score): list of words separated by comma, can contain newlines but comma must be present example score-words(200): these, are, some, words, which, presence, of, increases, the, score, each, word, by, 200, So, if you know english better than me, which you likely do, go ahead and improve the configuration file there, no worries, huggle's config parser is very syntax-error proof. If you have any other suggestion how to improve huggle's prediction, go ahead and tell us!

8 8

Recommended viewing: talk on Cognitive Science and Design
by Derk-Jan Hartman 17 Aug '14

17 Aug '14

I just love this Google I/O 2013 talk on human perception and cognition, and its implications for interactive and visual design. It is accessible, but with a lot of information and applies very well to us I think. I'm sure that many designers know all about this and some have probably seen the clip before, but it is also very good for developers, because many of these things we know subconsciously, but it's not really part of our vocabulary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2exxj4COhU DJ

3 2

question about standardized thumbnail sizes
by Sumana Harihareswara 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

I asked some folks about https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Standardized_thumbnails… . Antoine, the original author, said on the talk page: "We had several mailing list discussion in 2012 / beginning of 2013 regarding optimizing the thumbnails rendering. That RFC is merely a summary of the discussions and is intended to avoid repeating ourself on each discussion. I am not leading the RFC by any mean, would be nice to have the new multimedia team to take leadership there." Gergo of the multimedia team has a question about whether he should start a new RfC, and a question for Ops (below), which he said I could forward to this list, so I'm doing so. :-) If we can settle this onlist, cool. Otherwise I'll be setting up an IRC chat for later this week. Sumana Harihareswara Senior Technical Writer Wikimedia Foundation On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza(a)wikimedia.org> wrote: > > Hi Sumana! > > We are working on some form of standardized thumbnail sizes, but it is not > exactly the same issue that is discussed in the RfC > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Standardized_thumbnails…> > . > > The problem we have ran into is that MediaViewer fits the image size to > the browser window size (which means a huge variety of image sizes even > when the browser window is fully enlarged, and practically infinite > otherwise), > but thumbnail rendering is very slow and waiting for it would result in a > crappy user experience. We started using a list of standardized thumbnail > sizes, so that MediaViewer always requests one of these sizes from the > browser and rescales them with CSS, but even so the delay remains > problematic for the first user who requests the image with a given bucket. > To address that, we are working with ops towards automatically rendering > the thumbnails in those sizes as soon as the image is uploaded. > > Another possibility related to standardized thumbnail sizes that we are > exploring is to speed up the thumbnail generation for large images by > having a list of sizes for which the thumbnail is pregenerated and always > present, and resize one of those thumbnails instead of the original to > generate the size requested by the user. The goal of this would be to avoid > overloading the scalers when several large images need to be thumbnailed at > the same time (GWToolset caused outages this way on a few occasions). > > I can create an RfC about one or both of the above issues if there is > interest in wider discussion. I don't know whether the current thumbnail > size standardization RfC should be replaced with those, though; its goals > are not stated, but seem to be mainly operations concerns (how to make sure > thumbnails don't take up too much storage space). Maybe ops wants to take > it over, or provide clearer goals in that regard for the multimedia team to > work towards. > > >

3 3

[RFC] Extension registration
by Legoktm 31 Jul '14

31 Jul '14

Hi everyone, I've written an RfC about changing the way extensions store metadata about themselves and also how we load them. It's at <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Extension_registration>. A brief summary: Extensions register a lot of things, like classes, hooks, special pages, configuration options, and plenty more. Currently all of these are usually stored in the extension's main entry point ($IP/extensions/Foo/Foo.php). This creates two problems. First, it's difficult to tell what an extension is going to register without actually enabling the extension. Second, registration currently depends on global state ($wgHooks, $wgSpecialPages, etc.) which we are trying to move away from. My proposal is that we store this information in a JSON file (I've provided an example on the RfC), and have MediaWiki read them when loading extensions. We would no longer use the current method of require_once "Foo.php";, but instead $wgEnableExtensions[] = 'foo';, and MediaWiki would take care of the rest. Please leave any comments or thoughts you might have on the talk page. Thanks, -- Legoktm

3 5

Feedback for mediawiki api development course on codecademy.
by Diwanshi Pandey 25 Jul '14

25 Jul '14

Hello everyone, I am Diwanshi Pandey, an OPW intern. I'd like to have your feedback on the course I have created on codecademy for mediawiki api with help of my mentor Yuri Astrakhan. A little insight: The course is about parsing and querying mediawiki api. Initially we created one course which included 44 exercises but according to codecademy's guidelines their course are for beginners and should have maximum 30 exercises in one course. So we did a split up into two courses: One is Introduction to Wikipedia API<http://www.codecademy.com/courses/web-beginner-en-vj9nh/0/1>and other is Wikipedia:Query API <http://www.codecademy.com/courses/web-beginner-en-yd3lp/0/1>. Also due to api security and restrictions we couldn't implement tutorial on "editing wiki pages through api call" from a non wiki site yet. We are waiting till we find a good and easy way to demo that. Feedback may include: * Are the exercises easy to understand for novice users/developers? * Are changes needed in the look of exercises? * Are there any exercises which need not to be implemented or in too depth? * Any other thing? Thanks, -- *Regards,* *Diwanshi Pandey*

4 8

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Wikitech-l June 2014