It sounds great, but for widespread acceptance you're going to have to dumb it down. Avoid words like "conjecture" and "debate". Maybe "idea" and "discussion" or something :)
I couldn't agree with you more. I've actually gone through many iterations of descriptive words for the elements, including changing the structure so that a conjecture was actually a question (because some people think it's impossible to improve on socratic method). The current set of words are specifically for describing the idea to people who might be able to actually implement it, not for describing it to people who might want to use it. They most specifically convey the meaning. For a working version, I expect things to be described by people who know how to teach ideas to people, not those who know how to implement them.
Do you have any working prototypes?
I wish I did. For the past two years I've had so much on my plate that the edges of the plate have been cracking off. I've started and stalled the project several times in the past five years, and I just had to admit that I'll never get it done on my own. However, I continue to have great faith in this tool's ability to help people achieve greater harmony, so I continue to look around for others who might be able to help.