On 6/3/05, Erik Moeller <erik_moeller(a)gmx.de> wrote:
> One: wiki-research-l, "A low volume list for
people who are actively
> engaged in research on the Wikipedia project"
...
I
don't want to see an artificial split between research on MediaWiki and
MediaWiki development. Stuff like HistoryFlow also should be discussed on
wikitech-l, in my opinion.
Really? I'm interested because I'm starting a research project this
summer, and HistoryFlow is one of my starting points. Why is that
more tech-l-y than research-l?
Also, is there a page for all known prior research? Seems like there
should be, and knowing prior art would help folks starting anew with
inspiration and direction.