Not that I have anything at all about a Wikipedia in murcian, or
quenya for that matter, but:
murcian (a language spoken by more than 300.000
persons) in the
south-east of Spain, between the castilian and catalan)
The ethnologue (
http://www.ethnologue.com/) has no entry for "murcian"
(not even for "panocho", which I assume you're referring to), neither
does the English Wikipedia. There *is* a reference in the Language
Museum (
http://www.language-museum.com/m/murcian-panocho.htm),
however.
I must say, I would dispute the claim about the 300,000 people, as not
a single murcian I know ever talked that language, or even *about*
that language, to me. I'd be most linguistics experts would not
classify "murcian" as a language, but as local variant of Spanish (but
I assume this is gonna cause some friction :)
But anyway, the point is moot, I'm not gonna say to you whether you
should or shouldn't start a Murcian Wikipedia, of course (not that I
would have the slightest authority, I'm just a lurker here).
The problem is this one:
two weeks ago.I have already got the support of more
than 6 persons. I am > sure more people will be interested.
With a speaker base of 300K, most of them no interested at all in the
Wikipedia, do you really thing it is going to fly someday? I'd say the
real "collaborator base" is way too small to make a possible Murcian
Wikipedia successful. Or are you talking about a Wikipedia restricted
to all things murcian? (which would, perhaps, be more logical and far,
far easier)
Just curious, no hostility here,
/L/e/k/t/u