From a Wikidata point of view, it's really good to
have one dedicated page
ofr the "work" and different ones for the
"editions": you can structure
both Wikisource and Wikidata with a clear structure, without ambiguities.
This is an example of a Wikisource Work page:
https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Opera:Filocolo
These are very important books that have had different editions in the
past, and a dedicated namespace is good so you can have
* dedicated templates
* dedicated categories
* dedicated layout
A disambiguation page is in ns0, and it's conceptually different from a
"multiple edition" page... So in this way is easy to tell the difference.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON <
vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2017-10-31 18:45 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni
<zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>om>:
For the "work" concept, Italian
Wikisource decided to create a real and
new namespace, "Opera" (which means work).
It's the one page where we store the links to multiple editions of a
certain book we have.
It's not a disambiguation page in the sense that a disambiguation page
works with different books from different authors with the same title
e.g. "Poems"...
Aubrey
I forgot about that too.
Aubrey; Could you tell us the advantage and inconvenient of this system
(and in comparison to the 'multiple editions' pages of the others
Wikisources).
Cdlt, ~nicolas
PS: this is the kind of question that would be interesting to have during
a hangout session like we had (I will write a separate mail to re-launch
them)
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l