Another question for Tpt: how far is the implementation of the Visual Editor inside the Proofread Extension? Who's working on it? Just you, as always?
Aubrey
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, zdzislaw zdzislaw.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
2015-08-11 11:28 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at gmail.com
: Then it seems that the quality level has not the same meaning on every wikisources. Typo such as « rn » intead of « m » are usually removed on the red or yellow step on fr.ws (and such obvious error can be seen before editing, reviewing the final render code seems enough
to me). on pl ws it should be done on "without text" -> red step
for me all typo should be gone at the previous stage (and personally, I don't go from red to yellow if there is still such typo
mistakes). should be... but statistically on red-> yellow step I find 2-4 typos, on yellow-> green step - 1-2 typos (on fr ws too); if on yellow-> green step I could not found any typos, I do not change its status immediately, leave it on another day to be sure.
I'll write it again ... that is not safe to validate a page without reviewing its wikicode. A BGB at the end of the PREVIEW(!) content in Page namespace WITHOUT displaying and reviewing wikitext content (raw code) it's a bad proposal, declining the quality of proofreading process results, and... I do not think so that "it's unrealistic to expect the raw code to be review for all page" for that kind of "edition" it should be special level "pseudovalidate" - best in pink.
Z.
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l