I see an argument unsupported by evidence, and without evidence it approaches baseless and without value.
Please go and write an essay about the matter at https://wikisource.org/ referencing the original argument for the split, and how the reintroduction of a single site would be of value, and how it might be done. In fact how it will be better than now. Otherwise all I see is a doom and gloom worry-wort.
Regards, Billinghurst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Alex Brollo alex.brollo@gmail.com wrote:
I'm deeply convinced that splitting wikisource projects into variuos languages has been a mistake.
Is anyone so bold to imagine that it is possible to revert that mistake?
Or, are we forced to travel along the diabolicum trail?
Alex
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l